Norton Scientific Reviews -Group

Norton Scientific Research -Squidoo
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/user/blog/racquathink/view=82284160/

 

Fwd: Norton Scientific Scam | Tumblr In this piece Roger Bate, Donald Roberts and Richard Tren accuse the UN of "Scientific Fraud against DDT". Their Accusation is based on an Opinion paper byRoberts and Tren published in Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine. So let's look at their paper and see where the "Scientific Fraud" is.

Norton Scientific Inc. (NSI) is a biotech company. The technology base and know-how involves the use of guided wave laser optics, microfluidics and robust data analysis software for the development of novel, low-cost, easy-to-use analytical separations systems for use in a variety of markets, including biopharmaceuticals, wound healing, food & beverage, bio-materials and environmental monitoring.

Fwd: Norton Scientific Scam | Tumblr In this piece Roger Bate, Donald Roberts and Richard Tren accuse the UN of "Scientific Fraud against DDT". Their Accusation is based on an Opinion paper byRoberts and Tren published in Research and Reports in Tropical Medicine. So let's look at their paper and see where the "Scientific Fraud" is.

Norton Scientific Inc. (NSI) is a biotech company. The technology base and know-how involves the use of guided wave laser optics, microfluidics and robust data analysis software for the development of novel, low-cost, easy-to-use analytical separations systems for use in a variety of markets, including biopharmaceuticals, wound healing, food & beverage, bio-materials and environmental monitoring.

System Tool 2011 || Norton Scientific Scam -racquathink

http://racquathink.livejournal.com/2213.html

This System Tool 2011 removal guide includes 2 System Tool 2011 Videos and a Manual Guide. 

Jacob is the Creator of this guide and the person donating his time and efforts to create the videos for this guide as well as any updates. He is also helping to respond to comments for the System Tool 2011 guide. You can show your support by clicking the FaceBook Like button and by mentioning the RemoveVirus.org website to others. All purchases of software linked on this site also help support the RV website. 

Updated: 3-6-2011: Latest instruction set added for newer traces. 

Updated: 1-09-2011: New Security Tool 2011 file paths. 

Description: System Tool 2011 AKA System Tool is a clone of Security Tool. This false security client is nothing more than a scam setup to steal peoples money. 

How Did I get infected with System Tool 2011? 

Computers get infected with System Tool 2011 from what is known as a Drive By Download and from installing a program that that thought was something else like a video update. A drive by download is when a malicious website or website that has been hacked, injects code onto that web page and when a user visits the page he/she is prompted to run or install a program. In some cases these programs may auto install. Most paid clients out there like Spyware Doctor with Antivirus are able to block these types of infections. If your antivirus software did not block this install you should consider making a switch. It's obvious whatever you have is not protecting you.

Norton Scientific Reviews: Symantec source code leaked by hacker

http://www.widepr.com/pdf/press_release/33170/norton_scientific_reviews_symantec_source_code_leaked_by_hackers.pdf

Norton Scientific Reviews: Symantec source code leaked by hackers

A group of hackers who call themselves the Lords of  Dharmaraja, (and is associated with Anonymous) have published the source code of Symantec

A group of hackers who call themselves the Lords of  Dharmaraja, (and is associated  with Anonymous) have published the source code of Symantec, a digital security firm  know for the Norton antivirus program and pc Anywhere, raising concerns that others  could exploit the security holes and try to control the users computer.

The release of the source code came after the 'extortion' attempt failed as Symantec  did not comply with their numerous deadlines. Negotiations through email messages between a representative of the hacker group, 

YamaTough, and someone from Symantec were also released online. The exchange of  messages are about Symantec's offer to pay USD 50,000 for the hackers to stop  disclosing the source code and announce to the public that the whole Symantec hack  was a fake, which made them a subject of mockery for appearing to buy protection.

Both sides admitted that their participation was just a trick. The hackers denied any extortion aim, saying that they never intended to take the  money and were going to publish the source code whatever happens; they simply want  to humiliate them so they played along. While Symantec said that they are not actually  the one in communication with the hacker, but a law enforcement agent. The long negotiation worked to the favor of Symantec as they have been able to come  up with patches to theirNorton and pcAnywhere programs. Symantec has advised their  users to stop using the softwares in the meantime until they have issued more patches  for them.

Symantec released a statement saying that they have always been prepared for the  leak of the source code so they've made and distributed hotfixes on January to secure  their users. The drawn-out negotiation is an obvious sign of a law enforcer on the other line.  Delaying tactics is one of their assets to obtain insight into the enemy. More  importantly, it will create more transactions where paper trail will be left along the way  -- utilizing persons who have been involved in the process and the records themselves  to trace the suspects.

It has been a common ploy of investigators like the FBI who deal with kidnappers or  extortionists to break down the amount into several smaller payouts. Since 2006, Symantec has already suspected there has been a network breach but they were not able to verify any data pilfering until recently when the hackers threatened them to release the source code of Norton.

There are further reports saying that the source code of Symantec was stolen from  servers of India's intelligence and military department.  (They alleges that Symantec  has previously given India the code to guarantee the government that they contain no  malicious program.) However, this was denied by Symantec -- they have already  admitted that the theft happened in their own servers and network.

The security firm formerly said that the Indian group was also the one responsible for  the 2006 breach but retracted it today. They are now saying they're not sure who stole the source code in 2006 and how they managed to get their hands on it. Norton Scientific Reviews is maintained by a blogger-cum-security-specialist who keeps  a close watch on the tech industry and the trend of badware. This blog aims to educate  the public and keep the pros up-to-date with regards to malicious software and their respective anti-virus counterparts.

In this digital age, being in-the-know is the most elementary step to avoid getting owned. Norton Scientific Reviews covers even the most basic concepts on malware and  infection prevention for newbies. While for tech junkies, there are also in-depth  software reviews and jargon-filled tech reports on various topics.

Norton Scientific Reviews: Symantec source code leaked by hackers

A group of hackers who call themselves the Lords of  Dharmaraja, (and is associated with Anonymous) have published the source code of Symantec, a digital security firm know for the Norton antivirus program and pcAnywhere, raising concerns that others could exploit the security holes and try to control the users computer.

The release of the source code came after the ‘extortion’ attempt failed as Symantec did not comply with their numerous deadlines.

Negotiations through email messages between a representative of the hacker group, YamaTough, and someone from Symantec were also released online. The exchange of messages are about Symantec’s offer to pay USD 50,000 for the hackers to stop disclosing the source code and announce to the public that the whole Symantec hack was a fake, which made them a subject of mockery for appearing to buy protection.

Both sides admitted that their participation was just a trick.

The hackers denied any extortion aim, saying that they never intended to take the money and were going to publish the source code whatever happens; they simply want to humiliate them so they played along. While Symantec said that they are not actually the one in communication with the hacker, but a law enforcement agent.

The long negotiation worked to the favor of Symantec as they have been able to come up with patches to their Norton and pcAnywhere programs. Symantec has advised their users to stop using the softwares in the meantime until they have issued more patches for them.

Symantec released a statement saying that they have always been prepared for the leak of the source code so they’ve made and distributed hotfixes on January to secure their users.

The drawn-out negotiation is an obvious sign of a law enforcer on the other line. Delaying tactics is one of their assets to obtain insight into the enemy. More importantly, it will create more transactions where paper trail will be left along the way — utilizing persons who have been involved in the process and the records themselves to trace the suspects.

It has been a common ploy of investigators like the FBI who deal with kidnappers or extortionists to break down the amount into several smaller payouts.

Since 2006, Symantec has already suspected there has been a network breach but they were not able to verify any data pilfering until recently when the hackers threatened them to release the source code of Norton.

There are further reports saying that the source code of Symantec was stolen from servers of India’s intelligence and military department.  (They alleges that Symantec has previously given India the code to guarantee the government that they contain no malicious program.) However, this was denied by Symantec — they have already admitted that the theft happened in their own servers and network.

The security firm formerly said that the Indian group was also the one responsible for the 2006 breach but retracted it today. They are now saying they’re not sure who stole the source code in 2006 and how they managed to get their hands on it.

Norton Scientific Reviews

Norton Scientific Reviews-Home

http://http://nortonscientificreviews.com

Norton Scientific Reviews is maintained by a blogger-cum-security-specialist who keeps a close watch on the tech industry and the trend of badware. This blog aims to educate the public and keep the pros up-to-date with regards to malicious software and their respective anti-virus counterparts.

ABOUT US

Norton Scientific Reviews is maintained by a blogger-cum-security-specialist who keeps a close watch on the tech industry and the trend of badware. This blog aims to educate the public and keep the pros up-to-date with regards to malicious software and their respective anti-virus counterparts.

In this digital age, being in-the-know is the most elementary step to avoid getting pwned. Norton Scientific Reviews covers even the most basic concepts on malware and infection prevention for newbies. While for tech junkies, there are also in-depth software reviews and jargon-filled tech reports on various topics.

PRIVACY POLICY

http://nortonscientificreviews.com/privacy.html

The Norton Scientific Reviews Blog may enable you to submit your personal content to the Site for hosting and display ("Submissions"), such as posting messages, comments and other content to sections of the Site. When you provide Norton Scientific Reviews with a Submission, you grant to Norton Scientific Reviews and its representatives the right to grant sublicenses, to display, publicly perform, distribute, store, transcode, broadcast, transmit, reproduce, edit, modify, create derivative works, and otherwise use and reuse your Submissions (or any portions or derivative works thereof) in any manner, in any medium, for any purpose.

You acknowledge and agree that you have no expectation of compensation or confidentiality of any nature with respect to any Submission. Submissions may be available to all viewers of this Blog.

Norton Scientific Reviews reserves the right to display advertisements in connection with your Submissions, this Blog and any other Norton Scientific Reviews products or services. We reserve the right to modify Submissions in its sole and absolute discretion.

We are not required to host, display, or distribute any Submissions, and may refuse or remove them at any time.